this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
681 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

48213 readers
882 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jim@programming.dev 119 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think a few folks haven't read the article or know who Jeff Geerling is. The title of this article is confusing.

Jeff posted a video on YT about how to self-host your own media in 2024. He recently got a violation from YT that YT considers his video to be harmful and dangerous. He appealed, got denied, but then the update is that YT removed the violation.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Saw the video… It mentions ”ripping” and even shows clips of some blockbuster movies. No wonder any copyright-sensitive automation gets triggered pretty fast. This will only get worse.

[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think if the ripping includes de-DRM-ing it's is illegal in a lot of countries. I am not saying it's right, we should own our own content, I am just saying it as a fact.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah isn't that crazy?

Copyright by itself only protects distribution but then laws like DMCA (US) and EUCA (EU) make drm removal illegal. Its hard to believe that these laws exist and should be opposed at every possible opportunity.

Can you imagine buying an ebook and being told you can't remove malware from some strings of text or you'll go to prison? Also you have no consumer protections like refunds or ability to pass down the license so you're literally have worse consumer rights than a physical product and digital data costs nothing!

The current copyright framework is so broken and so toxic it needs to be completely destroyed.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if I decide to digitize my entire movie catalog? I would have to rip those DVDs and blurays...

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah. That's illegal in lots of countries.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it is legal in the country he lives in as well as the country YouTube is headquartered in.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it? I'm not totally sure, as I'm not from the US but I think the DMCA is the nasty player in this game.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Technically I'm half right and half wrong (I think). It's not illegal to backup media that one owns, but it is illegal to break DRM/copy protection which is required to rip most physical media these days.

Suffice to say the legality of it is a cluster fuck, but the morality, in my opinion, is pretty clear. Fuck the corpos.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah fuck them.

Nearly all digital media is locked so in order to back up something you own you'll have to break the lock. Fuck. Them. (And the people who voted for these laws)

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

You are allowed to record content like a broadcast though, which makes me wonder if that means that ripping is illegal, but piping it through a capture card isn't?

[–] anzo@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

A lot of people don't realise that the application of the VCR was technically copyright infringement, especially so when you lent tapes to your friends.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty fast? The video was uploaded in 2024.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

”Pretty fast” after they tuned those automations to the current setting. And they will keep turning it that way unfortunately.