this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
288 points (90.4% liked)

Fuck AI

3011 readers
716 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

TextAI is so fucked. For so many reasons. Flooding us with slop and scams, destroying the usable internet, taking people's jobs, accelerating climate change, disseminating misinformation and fascist propaganda, violating people's privacy, hampering people's ability to think critically...

It's alsk being used to sexually harrass and exploit people. If you've ever posted a pic of a human online, some fucking creep could be making porn with it right now, without your consent. Pics of you, your family, your kids. And they try to convince us there are good use cases for it. \ ‪ What I find insidious is that they sell us this evil technology via funny little trends. Make a doll of yourself, Ghibli-fy your pictures... Or convenience, ai overviews, respond to emails for you... And the normies playing with it have no fucking clue they are being used to train it, to hone it.
‪ And every time someone insists this tech is inevitable, don't fight it, it's here to stay, I just feel this pit in my stomach growing, I'm sickened by a world so apathetic and lacking in humanity. Fight this! Stop letting them kill your soul!
‪ The world doesn't have to be this way. We don't have to indulge the cruelest among us.
‪ Like do you think the people who casually play with it would feel differently knowing that by using it they are improving the technology used to generate cp? Should we just start telling them that point blank? Like, I know you probably didn't know this, buuuuut...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We should also be specific in what we oppose.

"Artificial Intelligence" is probably one of the broadest terms in common use today.

IMO, this is what we should oppose:

  • Diffusion, tensor and GAN-based Image and video generation, no exceptions, they serve zero practical purpose
  • Voice duplication, GAN-based voice generation is ok and is a good thing for accessibility
  • Non-voice GAN-based audio generation
  • Black box LLMs, LLMs can be genuinely useful tools but they HAVE to be trained ethically in a provable way that matches the OSI's definition of FLOSS

I might have missed some, but IMO, large language models and voice generation can be done ethically and are ok in very narrow contexts. Both of these are tools and should never be used as a final product.