this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
1503 points (91.8% liked)

Memes

45194 readers
1497 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Monkstrosity@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s just like socialism; great concept, but impossible to perfectly implement. That said, I’d still prefer a system where I maintain independence and freedom than any alternative since humans are inherently are own largest problems.

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd prefer a system similar to what we have in germany right now as it is a mix of socialism and capitalism in a way that reduces the exploitation that free market capitalism brings. Complete freedom in market almost always leads to exploitation which is terrible

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What, specifically, are you meaning when you use the term "capitalism"? There is a difference, for example, between an anarcho-capitalist, or fundamentally free market, and a competitive free market. One is alright with the existance of monopolistic/anti-competitive behaviour, and the other is not.

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How exactly does Germany reduce exploitation from capitalism? Is it labor laws? I would like to remind you that having social programs and laws that benefit the working class is not socialism.

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe saying socialist is an overstatement i just think that our current system is a step in the right direction as there are laws in place to reduce exploitation and improve the situation for workers. It is still very flawed and i think it could be better but there are many places where it is bad, the US for example

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It’s just like socialism; great concept, but impossible to perfectly implement

Would you mind defining "impossible to perfectly implement"? I don't want to draw conclusions based on interperetations of that statement.