this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
176 points (99.4% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

3184 readers
8 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45678297

In a chilling sign of how far law enforcement surveillance has encroached on personal liberties, 404 Media recently revealed that a sheriff’s office in Texas searched data from more than 83,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras to track down a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion. The officer searched 6,809 different camera networks maintained by surveillance tech company Flock Safety, including states where abortion access is protected by law, such as Washington and Illinois. The search record listed the reason plainly: “had an abortion, search for female.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This headline makes it sound like the police hunted someone down for having an abortion, but in fact the woman's family reported her missing, and the police used this database to try to locate her in that capacity. The potential for misuse is certainly there, but isn't what happened here

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Why did she "go missing" ?

Because she needed privacy to get an abortion from the police in Texas.

Why didn't she want to tell her family where she was ?

Because it would implicate them in her having an abortion which is her right.

Her abortion is not Texas' nor her family's business. And making excuses for that dynamic is white knighting authoritarian abuses.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Her family knew she had had an abortion before reaching out to the sheriff's office. When reporting her missing, the family told the sheriff's office about the abortion and their concern about her physical safety, which is why he listed that as the reason he needed to locate her in the database.

So she did tell her family, then went out of communication for days, and her family, who was worried about her, issued a "request to locate," which has a police department attempt to verify someone's safety. Once they established phone contact with the woman and verified she was safe, the entire thing was over.

If someone you love suddenly goes incommunicado like this and you're worried about them, you have the same right to issue a "request to locate" and have the police attempt to verify they're alright.

Sheriff Adam King of the Johnson County Sheriff’s Office told 404 Media in a phone call that the woman self-administered the abortion “and her family was worried that she was going to bleed to death, and we were trying to find her to get her to a hospital.”

“We weren’t trying to block her from leaving the state or whatever to get an abortion,” he said. “It was about her safety.”

He said the search “got a couple hits on her on Flocks in Dallas,” but Flock was not responsible for ultimately finding her. Two days later the Sheriff’s Office was able to establish contact with the woman and verify she was okay, he added.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Bullshit stop licking their boots. ACAB and I don't buy their story. They don't give damn one about your safety.

The search record listed the reason plainly: “had an abortion, search for female.”