this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
84 points (96.7% liked)

Programming Humor

3211 readers
1 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not my old ass over here cheering for functional coding… nope…

… but yep.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Love functional coding. Depending on the use case it works really well.

Wonder what return based is, sounds similar to functional.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Less of a paradigm but a way to write exploits but still more of a paradigm than vibe coding. It basically means "hey I can buffer overflow over the return address, let's treat the program's code as a VM to do what I want".

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Wow, I never even knew about ROP until today. I feel kind of silly 😅

This is interesting, but I don’t think I could find a genuine use-case for it.