this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
756 points (96.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4988 readers
657 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago (5 children)

We should only watch the real old trek.

I mean, it was one of the first shows ever to:

  • have a woman in a command position,
  • depict a black person in a non-servile role,
  • show Russians and Americans working as a team during the Cold War, and
  • have an Asian character portrayed by an actual Asian actor,

but it wasn’t woke!

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

MLK Jr himself called Nichelle Nichols to encourage her to play Uhura. First interracial kiss on scripted television. She worked with NASA after Trek to encourage and recruit black and female astronauts.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

First interracial kiss on scripted television.

That's a common myth. There were several others before, some of which also had Shatner as one half of the kissing pair, believe it or not. Trek's was definitely more high-profile, though, and with several of the others it may have been hard to notice with that particular combination with the quality of televisions at the time; European man with Asian woman probably wasn't noticeable on a tiny '50s black and white TV.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which sounds wholesome (and I don't say it's not at all) until you realize Nichols wanted to do something else, I think it was musicals, and King convinced her by saying "we need you to have representation. When you're gone, anyone can take that position, even an alien" and so she stayed instead of self realization.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Certainly, worse things happened to her in her life.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have a Japanese character about 20 years after ww2.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Have a Russian character during the Cold War.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but it wasn’t woke!

If it wasn't for Kirk banging his way around the galaxy, it would have been.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Nothing compared to Riker.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's all Old Trek that came before the J.J. Abrams movie reboot.

but it wasn’t woke!

Define woke then, please.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Define woke then, please.

do you kids today really need /s behind every s?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You have no idea how many wild claims my autistic ass has seen that were absolutely serious.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It is because sarcasm needs tone. Which you do not have in text. As there is a person for every possible opinion out there and they have become more vocal in the internet i personally am annoyed by the motion that we are supposed to spot sarcasm. We all should just put that ugly s behind it, it is not that hard.

I guess i should have replied to the comment before you btw.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

It is because sarcasm needs tone.

not necessarily. you need context and it comes from other places than just tone of voice.

if someone just drops "of course star trek is woke" in the middle of written text in random place, it can be harder to decipher the intent than it would be in voice. but the original commenter did quite a good job to guide reader to understand their position on the topic. combined with what community we are in it is a no-brainer.

yeah, sometimes there are stupid people on the internet, but sometimes a joke is just a joke. in the old days when internet sounded like a tortured robot, people used to say "be conservative in what you send out and liberal in what you receive". times have indeed changed, but the rule still can come handy sometimes.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is because sarcasm needs tone. Which you do not have in text.

"Frodo didn't offer her any tea"

"And the more they drank, the more sober they were becoming"

Just off the top of my head.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you disagree that in many online conversations sarcasm is confused for serious statements and vise versa?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, that's not what I said. Just that to make clearly distinguishable and good sarcasm you don't need "/s". Most people can't, of course.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

Then i have to agree and its a good example aswell

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

were they, or did you just assume so?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Do you really want to say they weren't? Do you really want to deny my experiences?

Edit: don't bother answering, I'm blocking you. I don't like people referring to middle aged people as 'kids' and I don't like people doubting others' experiences without any knowledge about said experiences.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

Do you really want to deny my experiences?

i do. you just did not recognize pretty clear sarcasm, it is documented in writing above. it is unlikely that it was only time in your life it happened. so yeah, some of these experiences in your past were also cases where you did misread the situation.

your badly acted offense does not change anything about that.