this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
229 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

70173 readers
3732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Select Topic Area

Product Feedback Feature Area

Issues Body

I find the following two news items on the front page:

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-19-creating-issues-with-copilot-on-github-com-is-in-public-preview/

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-19-github-copilot-coding-agent-in-public-preview/

This says to me that github will soon start allowing github users to submit issues which they did not write themselves and were machine-generated. I would consider these issues/PRs to be both a waste of my time and a violation of my projects' code of conduct¹. Filtering out AI-generated issues/PRs will become an additional burden for me as a maintainer, wasting not only my time, but also the time of the issue submitters (who generated "AI" content I will not respond to), as well as the time of your server (which had to prepare a response I will close without response).

As I am not the only person on this website with "AI"-hostile beliefs, the most straightforward way to avoid wasting a lot of effort by literally everyone is if Github allowed accounts/repositories to have a checkbox or something blocking use of built-in Copilot tools on designated repos/all repos on the account. If we are not granted these tools, and "AI" junk submissions become a problem, I may be forced to take drastic actions such as closing issues and PRs on my repos entirely, and moving issue hosting to sites such as Codeberg which do not have these maintainer-hostile tools built directly into the website.

Note: Because it appears that both issues and PRs written this way are posted by the "copilot" bot, a straightforward way to implement this would be if users could simply block the "copilot" bot. In my testing, it appears that you have special-cased "copilot" so that it is exempt from the block feature.

image

So you could satisfy my feature request by just not doing that.

¹ i don't at this time have codes of conduct on all my projects, but i will now be adding them for purposes of barring "AI"-generated submissions Guidelines

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft is so deep in the AI nonsense that asking them to stop pushing CoPilot is time wasted that could be better spent on something else, like moving to a different platform. I honestly don't really see the point of remaining on GitHub. To me at least it doesn't offer anything particularly important I can't get elsewhere.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why not submit a million vibecoded PRs against various Microsoft repos? At some point they might get it.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 6 points 3 hours ago

The developers will hate you and the suits couldn't care less.