Not The Onion

16263 readers

679 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

197

Texas man sues Whataburger for nearly $1 million after burger had onions on it (www.kens5.com)

submitted 14 hours ago by Chozo@fedia.io to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HOUSTON — A Houston man is suing Whataburger for nearly $1 million after he says his burger had onions on it.

Turns out he had asked for a no-onions order.

On July 24, 2024, Demery Ardell Wilson had an allergic reaction after eating a burger that had onions on it at Whataburger, court documents say. He alleges that he requested the fast-food chain to take them off before serving him the burger.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 23 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

When i read the title i knew it was gonna be an allergy thing and yup i was right. Maybe not 1mil but allergies are serious.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, this story hit me kinda like the McDonald's hot coffee incident; it seemed silly and frivolous on the surface until you realize just how much danger the person could've actually been in.

Though I'm loving the comments in this thread. The arguments over corporate responsibility vs personal responsibility are pretty interesting!

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I think if a restauraunt says theyre willing to serve someone with serious alergies they should be suable when they fuck up. But I also know that fast food places mess up orders more often than not, and this guy has sued another fast food place for this, so he knows its dangerous to eat at fast food places but does it anyway presuambly because the benefits outway the consequences...

Fast food places just need a sign that says if "you have a serious alergy, dont eat here" or something a little more nuanced