this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
698 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

70173 readers
3442 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today we’re very excited to announce the open-source release of the Windows Subsystem for Linux. This is the result of a multiyear effort to prepare for this, and a great closure to the first ever issue raised on the Microsoft/WSL repo:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't understand this.

Does this mean Windows programs and exe files will now run natively on linux?

Edit: unclear why someone asking a question gets a 50/50 downvote to upvote response....

"OOOOHHHH!!!!! THIS GUY DOESN'T KNOW ALL THE THINGS I KNOW!!!! BOOOOO!!!!!"

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, as long as your Linux distro is Windows.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In my view it's a Linux subsystem for Windows.

Why the name is the other way around, I'll never understand.

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The original WSL doesn't use the Linux kernel at all, it's a Windows Subsystem for compatibility with Linux. WSL2 actually visualizes a complete Linux kernel, but the name stuck.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

The original WSL DOES use the Linux kernel. Which runs as a native NT process (there's a huge difference between NT and Win32 processes). But porting a Linux kernel into the NT binary is a maintenance nightmare, it's much easier to run the original in a slim VM.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 1 day ago

It's a windows subsystem, and it runs linux.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 3 points 1 day ago

Windows subsystem for (running) linux?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I guess the logic is that it's a subsystem of Windows for the purpose of running Linux apps.

Agree though that it's a confusing name. I remember thinking the same thing about Windows Subsystem for Android (the compatibility layer to run Android apps in Windows)

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah the naming is absurdly stupid. Its a linux subsystem that is part of windows nowadays. Its so people on windows can get access to a proper terminal interface.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

[Windows subsystem] for [executable environment] is the naming scheme. The default is Win32, there's one for POSIX (practically never used), and Linux runs in another.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/41409419

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Windows has a terminal interface already!

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that thing is a glorified childs toy tho

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 10 hours ago

You’re going to have to explain your reasoning here.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Why do you say that