this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
452 points (97.5% liked)

Uplifting News

14913 readers
1789 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The Supreme Court shouldn't even be appointable by a politician at all. It otherwise will be too partisan. If you ask me, the best government is one where the most powerful are no more powerful than you and me.

But anyway, the Supreme Court should also be significantly expanded. C = 0.075 3sqrt(US populace + 2) would be a good formula, where C = court size. The populace is all residents, legal and illegal.

According to this formula, the US in 2020 should've had 54 judges. The supreme judges could be elected from a pool of multiple random ballots, out of a pool of all federal judges, whereas the latter could be appointed by the same method, through a pool of all, who have passed juridicial examination; the examination requirements are set by an independent Examination Commission, randomly appointed from a group of all federal judges, who then have to give up their federal judgehood for life. The position is for as long as they would be federal judges.

Any judge also may not be politically active, ever. Once become a judge, you can never run in life anymore for politics, and vice versa.

Edit: I'd also add that the Supreme Court members shouldn't be able to be removed by a politician - only by 2/3 majority of another independent commission. This Safety Commission, like the Examination Commission, has half the amount of the Supreme Court's members, so 27 in this case. This commission is composed from randomly chosen federal judges who aren't part of the other commission nor are supreme court members. The position is also for life.

The Supreme Court's power to overrule politicians' breach of laws should also not be removable; and it should have the power to fire the members of cabinet, if there is a 2/3 support within the court.