this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
965 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck AI

2638 readers
1628 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
965
skills for rent (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah like if you start coming across snippets that aren't even properly indented, you know you're digging the real bottom of the barrel (been there while struggling to fix email templating I know nothing about back in the day). Now, the code you get from the LLM looks totally legit to the untrained eye, and it may even generate a convincing explanation.

But you won't have any indication when it's dead wrong until you try to run it. And even then, it may be "working" in a way unintended because you don't actually understand what you copy+pasted, because neither does the LLM ofc.

I can't even imagine the spaghetti bowl you can get yourself into if you just keep vibe coding yourself deeper and deeper, while understanding nothing.

The spaghetti bowl is the real problem. You can make something that works, but it's so fragile because the solution is rarely general and never elegant. The snippet might be surprisingly elegant, but it will reimplement the same code 3 different ways in 3 different places and the whole thing turns into a mess