this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
633 points (98.0% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Police investigation remains open. The photo of one of the minors included a fly; that is the logo of Clothoff, the application that is presumably being used to create the images, which promotes its services with the slogan: β€œUndress anybody with our free service!”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Indeed, once the AI gets good enough, the value of pictures and videos will plummet to zero.

This just isn't true. They will still be used to sexualise people, mostly girls and women, against their consent. It's no different from AI-generated child pornography. It does harm even if no 'real' people appear in the images.

Fucking horrible world we're forced to live in. Where's the fucking exit?

[–] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is different than AI-generated CSAM because real people are actually being harmed by these deepfake images.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I was replying to someone who was claiming they aren't harmful as long as everyone knows they're fake. Maybe nitpick them, not me?

Reak kids are harmed by AI CSAM normalising a problem they should be seeking help for, not getting off on.

[–] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im addressing you because you made the claim they are equivalent when they clearly are not.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No I didn't. Go nitpick someone else.

Or better still, explain why you think AI-generated CSAM isn't harmful. FFS

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's be real here:

Sure, it's not illegal. But if I find "those kinds" of AI-generated images on someone's phone or computer, the fact that it's AI-generated will not improve my view of that person in any possible way.

Even if it's technically "legal".

They tellin' on themselves.

[–] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

People who consume any kind of cp are dangerous and encouraging thar behavior is just as criminal. I'm glad that shit is illegal in most civilized countries.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sauce that allowing computer generated cp causes more harm?

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How is this place infested with so many fucking nonces?

I made no claims about "more harm" so what imaginary claim are you referring to in your attempt to justify CSAM?

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Oh, so you want more harm. Curious.