this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
74 points (96.2% liked)

Vegan

1111 readers
8 users here now

A community to discuss anything related to veganism.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] monogram@feddit.nl 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I keep saying the meat alternative producers need to come together and make new words and all use the same ones

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago

Part of the problem is with discoverability. If you make a completely new word, people have no idea what your product is like, so they're unlikely to try it.

I think the best solution for them is to use words similar to the animal product, but obviously different, like "chick'n" or "chickenless" for example. I prefer the latter because it's more explicit about not being chicken.

But yeah, getting some standardization on it would be a big step in the right direction.

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I had vegan bacon at one point, and it was NOT bacon, not even close. But it WAS good, it just needs an entirely different name.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In my experience vegan food is a lot better when it's not trying to pretend to be meat

[–] solbear@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I very much agree, but having these "substitutes" was something that facilitated cutting out meat for me, as all cooking I used to know revolved around meat as the main ingredient. In that sense these product serve a usefulness in reducing the threshold to move away from meat in the first place.

I guess it makes sense from a transitional perspective and I imagine they've gotten better over time. The last time I remember having a substitute it was much worse than the actual thing though.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago

Bakon, Börger, Chicin, Laam, Mætbølls, Shnittsel

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Absolutely fine with that idea.