this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
28 points (96.7% liked)
Europe
4748 readers
122 users here now
Europe
Rules:
- All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
- Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
- No personal attacks
- Posts in English, translations allowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Music, as with all art forms, can powerfully express emotion, including reaction to policy and politics. Communities cannot survive and thrive by ignoring its politics. And therefore nor can humanity. My point being, to be apolitical isn't inherently good for music, community nor humanity, and when it comes to supporting a genocide or apartheid and other inhuman antisocial behavior, that's a division worth making to benefit community and humanity.
Obviously it's fine to seek and enjoy less political works, I often do, but it's strange to suggest that artists should repress their politics in their art performance. Kneecap has made no secret that they are an anti-colonial republicanist act, naming themselves in reference to an IRA practice.
Thank you. Any kind of repression is unhealthy, which is one reason why I'm against some republican/conservative beliefs. I was trying to see it from the organisers' point of view.
Unfortunately, it seems that announcing their progressive views ahead of attendance at Kneecap, a host that openly prefers regression, only resulted in rejection on account of said host's intent to reject any view that doesn't align with their own.