Socialism

2828 readers

89 users here now

Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.

Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

OneRedFox@beehaw.org

The Strong Towns Movement is Simply Right-Libertarianism Dressed in Progressive Garb (www.currentaffairs.org)

submitted 1 year ago by OneRedFox@beehaw.org to c/socialism@beehaw.org

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Strong Towns’ critique of America’s car-centric sprawl sounds appealing. But its proposed solutions rely on a conservative politics that prioritizes ‘wealth creation’ over just and equitable urban planning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Andy@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that title's unfair, and that the approaches advocated by Strong Towns are probably closer to small-government Georgism, or Georgist municipalism.

The fact that the folks behind it identify as conservative is indeed a reason to, well, stay sharp and skeptical, but I think their flavor of conservatism is actually in direct conflict with most Americans who identify as such. Sort of like these folks actually believe what's commonly used as distracting rhetoric.

Then again, I'm probably outside the main demographic of this community, I'm critical of big centralized power, and I'm a fan of both urbanism and land value taxation, so I get it if you judge that I've been had here.