this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
1347 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

6871 readers
2388 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what automation is for.

Whenever I come across an interesting movie/show; I open a webpage that I host, search for a title (results from imdb) and click 'add+search'.

~15min later, it's available for me, my friends, and my family to watch on my own private streaming service. (for such reliably quick downloads, I recommend usenet over torrents)

Sonarr, Radarr, Emby/Jellyfin

Other users besides me can even request content via Ombi.

[–] techwithjake@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ombi always gave me issues and I switched to Overseerr. Similar but more in the *arr family. Since you use Jellyfin, can use Jellyseerr instead for a better integration.

Then use Prowlarr to sync Torrent/Usenet sites to all the *arr services.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

The three of them are all pretty similar, achieving the same goal; whatever works for you.

I've never had an issue with Ombi, so I've stuck with it. I actually use Emby instead of Jellyfin, so Overseerr isn't an option, and I've just not had a reason to try out Jellyseer over what's already setup and working.

Prowlarr is definitely a good recommendation. I used Jackett for the longest time; but being able to modify indexers in one place, then have it propagate to the rest of the stack is so much nicer. It lists a ton of indexers to look into too, if you need more.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

that's sounds so complicated, just downloading it myself is easier
if someone made one application to install and set it up automatically id probably try it though

[–] Discover5164@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

ooo that looks interesting. I will look into it more when I get home. Thanks for sharing

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My setup is a conglomeration of a quite a few different pieces; but they are not all required. I'd encourage you to explore, start small and expand into new pieces/areas when you feel comfortable. I started this ~8 years ago with basically 0 knowledge of hosting web services; and just built up the knowledge through exploration over time.

If all you're looking to do is watch movies, and you're happy to play the downloaded media directly on your pc (or move the files around manually, just like manual torrenting); the only piece you need is Radarr.

Once setup; You tell it what movies you want to watch, it searches for those using the indexers you've given it (YourBittorrent, TPB, and BadassTorrents for example), choses the best results out of them all based on things like upload date, seeds, quality descriptors in the title, etc. Then passes that to your torrent/usenet client. Finally it will rename and sort the files into nicely organized media folders for you, once the download client has marked it as complete.

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I want to organize and automate movies at some point, but the cost of managing additional hardware feels intimidating. How do you handle it? Doesn't arr stack require lots of processing power?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

The arrs are pretty light weight; the memory use can add up when you run several of them with really large libraries alongside other projects, but otherwise I hardly notice them running in the background. You don't need any sort of special hardware; this stuff will run on an old laptop you shove in the corner and ignore.

The part that really takes processing power is transcoding media between formats when streaming it to clients, but that's Emby/Jellyfins job.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is slowly what I'm working on

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There's a ton of people happy to help on !selfhosted@lemmy.world if you run into troubles :)

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Next year is the year I buy a new/new-ish dedicated family server. I will have to come back to this

[–] Lizardking13@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When it renamed them... Do you continue to seed (in the case of torrents)?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Torrents have two options:

Ideally you use Hardlinking - This creates a 'copy' of the file that's just a link to the original data, instead of actually duplicating it. This only works when both 'copies' are kept on the same drive/filesystem; but gives you two versions so you can leave one available to seed and have one renamed and sorted away.

Failing that, it can fallback to plain duplicating the files. One copy kept to seed, and one copy sorted away.

Personally, I've switched to usenet for 99% of downloads, so seeding isn't really a thing. It's there as a fallback though.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's complicated to get set up. Once done, it makes everything very simple.