this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
161 points (92.1% liked)

memes

14428 readers
3309 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

This is not true, for the same reason you can't bake a batch of cookies at 2300 degrees for 1 minute instead of 230 degrees for 10 minutes. I imagine delivering the amount of heat required to bake a pizza in the microseconds of a nuclear explosion would vaporize a substantial part of the explosion-facing side of the pizza while leaving the back frozen.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What if it's just enough to set the supermarket on fire and the cooler having enough insulation to have the perfect heat for baking?

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, that might work. You don't need a nuclear explosion to set a supermarket on fire so it would be a lot easier to test!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

We need the Mythbusters back

[–] cybrefool@lemmy.wtf 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What if the pizza was being rotated perfectly on a 360° gimbal at the same frequency as the microwaves generated? Hypothetically that is of course

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think spinning the pizza at relativistic speeds only causes more problems. Household microwaves run at 2.45 GHz, and at 2.45 billion revolutions per second a 3.9cm diameter pizza would have an edge velocity of the speed of light (ignoring relativity, which I'm sure does not make things better).

[–] cybrefool@lemmy.wtf 9 points 4 days ago

Would it be possible to use the pepperoni as a source of fuel for this reactor?

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So we don’t even need a nuke? We can just spin it really fast and it’ll cook itself?

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

maybe they arent actually close to the explosion and just get cooked by radiation?

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you're thinking of the neutron and gamma radiation emitted, that happens on an even shorter time scale than the thermal radiation (nanoseconds IIRC) and is absorbed poorly in comparison by a pizza.

[–] Bashnagdul@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That just means you need more of it

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We need a material in between pizza and nuke that absorbs the heat and then gives it off at a slower rate

[–] tfm@europe.pub 3 points 3 days ago

That sounds like a billion dollar idea!