this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
65 points (93.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
73 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    65
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by d_k_bo@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I rather look at the licenses.

    [–] Zeus@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    i think that's irrelevant. sure, webp might be open licence, but so is chromium to some extent and that's doing severe damage to internet health

    that said, apart from "it's an open format", i can't actually find any definitive answer on the webp licence

    [–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] Zeus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

    oh i know, i'm very pro jxl. but i was more saying why i don't like webp even if it is open-licence