Did she get snubbed by someone who's ace or something? Asexuality is possibly the most inoffensive sexuality in existence.

Like, oh no.

They don't experience sexual attraction.

That means they're probably significantly less likely to objectify or assault you than someone who isn't ace. Isn't that a good thing for someone supposedly so concerned with being objectified and violated, Miss Rowling?

What a wildly brain-dead take from someone who loves claiming to be a feminist.

(Yes, I know she's not actually a feminist, but it's another piece of hypocrisy to throw on the pile)