this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
433 points (96.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7451 readers
2677 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Elmo give 2.5% of his wealth?

Fuck that shit.

At best people like him should get to KEEP 2.5 % of their wealth. More reasonable, likely, will be TJ jail them as few billionaires can claim to gave gotten there without stepping on the back of someone. Elmo personally should be jailed for life.

Also, we don't need religions for tax. Just tax the rich fucking bastards

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Elmo give 2.5% of his wealth?

You seem to be misreading.

Give 2.5% of their wealth, each year, not just give 2.5% of their income. There's a huge difference.

Wealth gets taxed every year, unlike income which gets taxed only once. So in 20 years, the wealth tax is roughly 20*2.5% which is 50%. And in 30 years it's closer to 75%.

[–] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it is not 0.025*50. It is 0.975^20.

is roughly the same

the first results in 0.5, the second one in ~0.6.

but you're right, from an analysis point of view.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is exactly what I'm saying.

2.5% of his wealth is nothing, he quite easily gains or loses ten times that in a year

Set a maximum amount of wealth per person each year. Anything you earn over that automatically goes into a 100% bracket.

There literally is no reason why one person should be allowed to have a billion dollars in wealth, whilst another person is homeless and needs to waddle into crime to be able to feed themselves

10 million total wealth. That sounds like a reasonably sane maximum anyone should ever have the power over. Anything above that, taxes.

10 million total wealth

sounds reasonable IMO

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation pledge means keeping only 7% of annual income and it's still too much.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Anything over 10 million should be automatically 100% tax