this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
378 points (97.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
7473 readers
1891 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Less fun fact: When Disney put that movie up on Disney+ they for no justifiable reason started splicing and cutting the original version to add CGI to censor things out of the movie for "modern sensibilities" and then sold it as the same product without any warning.
I am much less afraid of the authoritarian who would ban 1984 from being read, and much more afraid of those authoritarians who take it to heart and take out all the "controversial" things and leave a completely declared and neutered 1984+ on the shelf.
Can someone use plain words to explain what happened here? Were pubes visible or something and they CGI'ed them out?
Never heard of this movie or anything about it but trying to piece it together from context clues in this thread is very confusing.
I just looked it up: Apparently there was a scene where the actresses butt was visible, which got covered by CGI hair extensions.
However, the movie has since gotten a 4K remaster on D+, which does not censor da booty.