Nintendo

20152 readers

19 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

No NSFW content.
No hate speech or personal attacks.
No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
No console wars or PC elitism.
Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

[S2] means Switch 2 only.

Other Gaming Communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

slimerancher@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id

picandocodigo@lemmy.world

Modded Switch console seller sentenced by Japanese courts in Nintendo's latest victory against piracy (www.notebookcheck.net)

submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/nintendo@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, I see. Weird, I don't remember that being in the article when I read it. Yeah, that was just dumb then. People who sell these things need to stop preloading them.

But now I need to look more into this, is there precedent for Nintendo going after people who sell Jailbroken devices without copyrighted content on them? I think if I ever tried to make a living like this, I would just avoid Nintendo all together. Well, anything 3DS or newer anyway. Those GBA mods these days are 🔥

[–] Ilandar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weird, I don’t remember that being in the article when I read it.

It's from a different article, that's why I linked it at the end of the quote.

is there precedent for Nintendo going after people who sell Jailbroken devices without copyrighted content on them?

Not that I'm aware of. Companies are generally much more concerned about distribution rather than usage, as the former has greater potential to affect them financially. That's why they try to shut down modding projects, go after re-sellers, threaten people who share (seed/host) pirated content, etc. It's much more efficient than trying to target individual users one-by-one. In adjacent industries, like the film and music industries, companies target torrent site owners and seeders rather than people who only download pirated content. The definitions and legal precedents around copyright law in particular countries can also make it difficult for companies to go after individual users. Basically every single case I have seen in the decades I've been following this stuff involved people who were trying to make money or distribute publically.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Right, that was always my understanding too, but I do know that there are also anti-circumvention laws that play a more direct role in the jailbreaking scene. I'm just not up-to-date on what's going on with that these days.