Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
- !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- !europe@feddit.org - News and information about Europe.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
Well, definitely more than you understand economy, it seems.
Aka the same line companies used when some places tried and succeeded in raising wages. Turns out the prices didn't go up, only the spending power of those with those wages, who bought more stuff. Some people have a beef against the idea of any sort of welfare net because it might be abused. Then try to make it less abusable, or better yet, try it and see what works, don't say "we tried nothing and we're all out of ideas."
Yeah, if by "abused" you mean working-class people getting "uppity" because they actually manage to get ahead for once.
Just a side note, if you want people to even consider your point of view, don't call them idiots. Off to blocklist you go! Bye.
Seems like you don't actually want to communicate
I did want to and as you can see in a sibling thread, we actually did discuss with someone who didn't decide that calling people idiots just because you don't have anything smarter to say is appropriate.
Artificially inflating prices to cancel out UBI would create economic incentive to undercut those corporations in a free market.
Government intervention could also be used in a less free market to ensure subsistence items aren't artificially inflated, after that who cares if some company inflates their price? Go work if you want a new shiny thing.
You know what's really good? Having a safety net to prevent the lowest suffering class of our society dying from things that we've been able to prevent for decades.
Having reduced crime because people aren't fighting over scraps.
Having more mobility in society so people can pursure careers and education that aligns with their own self fulfilment goals.
Stop fighting against a better world for all of us please.
That hasn't worked historically for any reason and UBI is not so magical that the whole of capitalism will sit on its ass and stop doing what it's doing.
Pretty much the same response as above, good luck with that.
Fully agree, I don't see how that relates to UBI, though.
I'm not, I'm just trying to explain that while UBI sounds good on paper, it can't work and never will. It's free money for everyone who owns capital, be it landlord or huge chains. They'll have your UBI, you'll have nothing and you'll pay for it from your taxes, because rich don't pay their taxes, definitely not the amount they should. So, where in that is your better world?
I get the point youre trying to make but a UBI is still a step in the right direction, I'd rather take the gamble and pay my taxes on it than have what we do now.
At the very least it would expose a lot of the systemic issues you've mentioned to the broader public, and hopefully that would lead to meaningful change.
I'd prefer a world where people are guaranteed the basics to survive without having to capitulate to the system, we have the technlogical progress and productive capabilities to do this we're just not there in terms of societal progression.
And I'm going to continue advocating for that world, whether it's UBI or unbiased infrastructure and systems to provide people with basic needs
I get that and I agree, but I don't think giving everyone money that can be stolen by the usual suspects is the solution. Safety nets are the way to go, not UBI.
If someone some day proves me wrong, I'll be happy to admit I was wrong, though I'm not gonna support UBI until that happens, because of the issues I outlined.
LOL, says the guy whose previous comment was nothing but a personal attack. You're just throwing a tantrum because you have no rebuttal.