this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

OpenBSD

541 readers
1 users here now

General OpenBSD community!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wayland requires a Desktop Environment from what I can see. There is Sway, but that is a tiling environment, but I know little about that. So for "floating windows", all there is GNOME3, KDE and Enlightenment. DE are heavy to begin with, cwm on X is very lite on resources.

This I am not sure about, but from what I have read, all window processing (rendering) needs to be done by the "Widow manager". In X you just call functions.

[–] Ew0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't need a DE, and Sway is pretty light and snappy.

[–] jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that is what people keep saying, but isn't sway a Tiling Window Manager ? I do not like Tiling, if something that works exactly like cwm, then I would not be too concerned about Wayland.

So far, the only choices for Wayland seems to be GMOME3, KDE, soon XFCE, the rest are tiling like sway. I just heard about Hyprland, which is also tiling.

So seems for me and I am sure others, the selection is very limited.

[–] jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

No sooner then I posted I ran across this:

https://hikari.acmelabs.space/

Once I am forced to use Wayland, hopefully that will still be active :)