this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
412 points (89.3% liked)

Comics

6655 readers
63 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not a zero sum game - the real problem is when it's competing with paid work

Commissioning an artist to do this is imaginary work - there's no money to be made here, who commissions a political comic? If you can't draw, you wouldn't be doing it

There's a problem if you're mass producing slop, or companies are using AI art to avoid paying artists... But this was a clear, human created message delivered by using a fancy tool

And what's more, this is an important message to spread ASAP.

Can you name a better situation to use Gen image AI, or do you just hate it because of what it is?

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[disclaimer: stealing from starving artists is bad]

Who commissions a political comic

lol

Great comment


I wish the courts decided everybody should use that Adobe model where anyone in the training set gets compensated. The debate immediately becomes far less interesting when nobody is obviously getting directly screwed.

Once that moral high ground is achieved, the arguments about increased accessibility of expression become more sympathetic. Then I can’t just care about the artist who needs to make rent, I have to care about the amateur filmmaker who can’t afford to traditionally storyboard their dream just like it is in their brain…

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, and there's children starving in Africa

I want artists to eat, and I also want everyone to have more access to expression. Me finishing my dinner doesn't help the kids in Africa, and if I made a comic I'm not stealing food from the artists mouths

If you want systematic changes, you need systematic solutions. Empty moralizing won't fix anything

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I suppose the systemic solution would be a mandate to follow an Adobe-style model.

Certainly seems impossible to harm anyone by making a comic for fun with an available tool.

For contrast -

Entrepreneurs who start small businesses today and especially the years to come 2026 will have to decide though where their morals lie - will an artist, or Altman, profit from the logo creation?