this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
306 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

15861 readers
2167 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see no errors in their statements :3

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Are there stars in our sky which are less than 100 yo?

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, im not an astrologist, so I only know what I know from like.. middle school class trips, but there are stars being born all the time im pretty sure :3

Are they observable in our sky at a 100 years old? Probably not :3 space is massive so light takes a while to get here at that distance

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren't visible less than 100 years ago?

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago

https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis

Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 1 week ago

The Milky Way is visible. It's estimated that approximately 6 new stars are formed in the Milky every year.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There are still stars forming, so probably yes if you use a super telescope

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

In order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

She didn't say there are any.