this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
603 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
4507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that "experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public" and "far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years" (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that "they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life." They're much more likely (51 percent) to say they're more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The first thing seen at the top of WhatsApp now is an AI query bar. Who the fuck needs anything related to AI on WhatsApp?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Who the fuck needs ~~anything related to AI on~~ WhatsApp?

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Lots of people. I need it because it's how my clients at work prefer to communicate with me, also how all my family members and friends communicate.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Right?! It's literally just a messenger, honestly, all I expect from it is that it's an easy and reliable way of sending messages to my contacts. Anything else is questionable.

[–] Nuxleio@lemmy.ml -3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There are exactly 0 good reasons to use whatsapp anyways...

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, there are. You just have to live in one of the many many countries in the world where the overwhelming majority of the population uses whatsapp as their communication app. Like my country. Where not only friends and family, but also businesses and government entities use WhatsApp as their messaging app. I have at least a couple hundred reasons to use WhatsApp, including all my friends, all my family members, and all my clients at work. Do I like it? Not really. Do I have a choice? No. Just like I don't have a choice on not using gmail, because that's the email provider that the company I work for decided to go with.

[–] Nuxleio@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 hours ago

SMS works fine in any country.

And you can isolate your business requirements from your personal life.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have 47 good reasons. There's 47 good reasons are that those people in my contact list have WhatsApp and use it as their primary method of communicating.

[–] Nuxleio@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. It's slow, can't send files, can't send video or images, doesn't have read receipts or away notifications. Why would I use an inferior tool?

Why do you even care anyway?

[–] Nuxleio@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Meta directly opposes the collective interests and human rights of all working class people, so I think the better question is how come you don't care.

There are many good reasons to not use WhatsApp. You've already correctly identified 47 of them.