this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
690 points (99.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7908 readers
589 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I get what you're saying but to me this act seems completely consistent with the standard Democrat mo of not taking action when it really matters, while acting when it doesn't. The mo that creates the impression of doing things by only doing an insufficient amount. Case in point - Booker's action did not take place a week ago during the CR vote. Doing it then would have really mattered. If it did, I'd have been shocked. We discussed this with some friends when the rumor came down that Chuck is going to vote for the bill. So now I can't shake the feeling this act is just meant to paper over that inaction which got many Democrat voters very angry at the party.
Democrats in Congress are experts at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, I get it. But what the senator did is something that would inspire individuals to organize into groups to put more pressure on the administration and its allies. Booker put a part of himself on the line, got his message out there.
After this is the part where the Democratic minority of the Senate, conceivably, will fail to follow through and organizing together and amongst their constituents and putting pressure on red state senators. At least I heard Booker was doing something along those lines in NJ this weekend. If they can force a 60%-80% productive work week in the Republican Senate that is something.
Democrats lose and fail on purpose. If they ever get a clear majority, they have a problem. How do they explain why they aren't getting us healthcare and human rights when the GOP is powerless? They can't. The mask would be completely off. So, instead they lose and then beg for money from idiots.