this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2638 readers
169 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A real solution?

No.

Neither is the Conservative or NDP ideas either though.

How much will all house prices drop if we build X?

If the answer isn't "the entire housing market will drop by greater than 50%" then you don't have a solution.

If the answer is "house prices will stay the same, or even keep going up" then you actually haven't done a fucking thing.

[–] CloudwalkingOwl@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that this proposal will definitely solve the housing crisis. But this is the third housing bubble I've seen in my lifetime. If it bursts like the first two, then housing will drop in price. (I bought my home when the 2nd bubble burst.)

The problem all over the world with housing is enough stock hasn't been built for decades. And Carney's proposal is the first one I've ever seen that actually deals with this problem and on the scale needed. It also identifies two things: that Canada has faced this problem in the past and fixed it, and, there has been a problem with govts not being willing to act decisively and fast enough to really make a difference.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

A) Even if the housing market dropped as much as it did in the 90s (about 30% in the toronto area) it STILL wouldn't be affordable. That's the problem here, the situation is so bad that even a massive crash isn't enough to fix it. It has to be completely ruined before we restore that tag.

B) There are more bedrooms in Canada than people, and given that a lot of people share bedrooms (couples and small children) that means there's actually a significant excess of housing. If you go back through my comment history you can actually find where I did the math and linked sources on this one. The problem is not the lack of housing, it's the distribution and allocation of housing. This problem can be fixed without building a single new home.