this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
406 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

13931 readers
1228 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's the significance of that number? It's less than 0.1 away from tau, but somehow I doubt that's it...

[–] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I can't be arsed to check but I think it's 2 pi which is useful when dealing with sine waves.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

2 pi is tau, which is what I said it's less than 0.1 away from, but still not equal to.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I assumed the number is not significant, figure it's just supposed to mock the idea that physicists don't know what tolerances are.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

An experimental physicist should know as far as I know meanwhile a real (theoretical) physicist would probably not even touch numbers that have those scary decimals.