Comic Strips

15668 readers

2738 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

1793

Apparently a right-wing deacon said this (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

226 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross posted from https://eldritch.cafe/@Jeanneadebats/114184886084246220

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Seems like it would be pretty difficult to get a camel through a needle eye. (That “oh he was actually referring to a gate” is modern horseshit apologetics designed for rich Christians to justify having money btw, totally made up.)

[–] sfu@lemm.ee -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wether Jesus was referring to the gate or not kind of doesn't matter, since it was followed with the comment “With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God.” Basically meant a rich man could never do it on his own.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s kinda amazing how many logical contortions and apologetics there are to attempt to justify a “Jesus didn’t have a problem with wealth” position. It’s almost as if wealthy people are really committed to coming up with some reason why they get to be the exception to the rule.

It is clear in context the “impossible” thing made possible through god would be the wealthy man giving up his possessions. Your interpretation makes the entire story completely pointless and irrelevant, and requires so many logical leaps as to be ridiculous.

I mean, look at Mark 6:19-21 too.

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

Jesus was flatly opposed to wealth. There is no way around this, it is consistent across the gospels (and not just the canon ones.)

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Jesus was against wealth as far how it corrupts people. But if God was completely against it, why would God have made David wealthy? Because its about the person, not the wealth itself.

I'm not denying Jesus's statements of the issues wealth causes people.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Are we supposed to act as David does? Slaying the Amalekite messenger, adultery with Bathsheba? (Possibly a gay relationship with Jonathan…?) Is what happens to Absalom a happy ending? Is Nathan’s story of the sheep that “pro wealth”?

The authors of the Gospels weren’t the authors of Samuel and Chronicles anyway. The Bible isn’t a unified document with one voice. I’m not really making an argument about what God would think about wealth, but what the historical Jesus would have thought. The evidence is pretty clear there - he wasn’t a fan of it.