this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4075 readers
144 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Didn't work out as she'd hoped I guess ?

The trial heard the "statement of notice" the woman handed to the care worker asserted she was "a living being sovereign to this land" who "hereby renounce and reject my former engagement with the courts… and their kronies (sic)… and disregard all orders as null and void".

Throughout the trial the woman regularly interrupted the proceedings, resulting in Judge Haesler finding her in contempt of court.

"[She] repeatedly interjected, directed personal insults to me and others, harassed witnesses (including her own [children]), refused my directions and orders and talked over me excessively," Judge Haesler wrote in a scathing judgement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I didn't know this flavor of dumbass was international, I thought we only grew them in the US. Though, given the beliefs, I suppose it really could be adapted anywhere.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

We import all sorts of fringe political positions from the US.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Including the not-so-fringe idea that voting for a minor party is a wasted vote.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

For what it's worth, plenty of the Australian SovCit stuff was also thieved from Canada (given our similar situation with UK legal history).

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ve seen it cited that the sovcit movement exists in 26 countries

[–] quokka@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

It exists wherever they say it does surely?

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We may have actually exported it to the rest of the world! In 1970, we had the Hutt River Province secede from the nation of Australia. To be fair to old Prince Leonard - he had valid grievances and was not just a nutter. The Australian Government was imposing wheat quotas on him when he was just about to harvest, and frankly didn't exactly offer him much in the way of services.

According to my 2-minutes of Wikipedia research (which makes me an expert on this topic, don't you know?), the Soverign Citizen Movement appeared in the USA in the "early 1970's". Which sounds to me like it may have drawn inspiration from the waves that Prince Leonard was making in Western Australia.

[–] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 6 points 4 days ago

@Nath

Some more "research" materials regarding unrecognised "micronations":
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation

As usual, Australia punches above its weight in this regard...

@Letstakealook

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Interesting. I know in the US they are closely tied to white supremacists, though there's been some branching out.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Tom Tanuki created a two-part summary of the two main Aussie SovCit movements:

p1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea_7jUU489g

p2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIrcWtuLkdA

A couple of interesting notes I remember:

  • Being more closely tied to British monarchy, our versions seem to stem more from the Canadian variant than the US, but there's def plenty of crossover.
  • Not sure if this is a big factor in the US movement too, but there's a big focus on the family courts, so plenty of them are disenfranchised divorced parents who lost custody and have engaged in collective harassment of ex-partners and legal workers like judges.
  • One of the main SovCit movements comes from an indigenous liberation perspective. It's just as much a scam and stands in the way of actual resistance efforts, but there's more to it than just ultraliberalism (e.g. US Libertarian ideology) and contrasts with the US SovCit White supremacy tones you mentioned.
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I think you most commonly encounter them in tax-related situations.

I know someone who works for the local government and issues notices for local taxes. In some ways it's a fairly natural progression to go from not wanting to pay your taxes to inventing some bonkers ideology explaining why you in fact do not need to pay taxes.

Comically, the city's first move with delinquents is to simply stop their refuse (garbage?) collection service.

[–] quokka@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

There's a few in Perth. They occasionally paste some laughable text in the local papers proclaiming that they are sole bodies and not beholden to taxation. Or some other bumph. It's odd that all sovshitness seems to come down to not paying taxes, while still using all the facilities that taxation provides.