this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
999 points (90.7% liked)
linuxmemes
24384 readers
837 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
3. Post Linux-related content
sudo
in Windows.4. No recent reposts
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ever since switching to fish, I've been using the terminal more and more. It's the most intuitive interface I can think of. Now to fix my neovim configuration...
I love fish, but I can see why POSIX purists would hate it. I haven't run into any problems, but if I need to use bash, I have it installed, too. The biggest problem is that it doesn't have wide adoption, so everybody assumes you're using bash, and a lot of the bash commands don't work in fish. So you have to be a bit of a power user if you want to do anything fancy.
Worst case scenario is that you run just those commands in sh. I don't see a problem really. I also like fish's syntax, so it's easy to trade for POSIX compatibility. If you really really must, you could also use an LLM to convert your bash script to fish.