this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

✍️ Writing

116 readers
1 users here now

A community for writers, like poems, fiction, non-fiction, short stories, long books, all those sorts of things, to discuss writing approaches and what's new in the writing world, and to help each other with writing.

Rules for now:

1. Try to be constructive and nice. When discussing approaches or giving feedback to excerpts, please try to be constructive and to maintain a positive vibe. For example, don't just vaguely say something is bad but try to list and explain downsides, and if you can, also find some upsides. However, this is not to say that you need to pretend you liked something or that you need to hide or embellish what you disliked.

2. Mention own work for purpose and not mainly for promo: Feel free to post asking for feedback on excerpts or worldbuilding advice, but please don't make posts purely for self promo like a released book. If you offer professional services like editing, this is not the community to openly advertise them either. (Mentioning your occupation on the side is okay.) Don't link your excerpts via your website when asking for advice, but e.g. Google Docs or similar is okay. Don't post entire manuscripts, focus on more manageable excerpts for people to give feedback on.

3. What happens in feedback or critique requests posts stays in these posts: Basically, if you encounter someone you gave feedback to on their work in their post, try not to quote and argue against them based on their concrete writing elsewhere in other discussions unless invited. (As an example, if they discuss why they generally enjoy outlining novels, don't quote their excerpts to them to try to prove why their outlining is bad for them as a singled out person.) This is so that people aren't afraid to post things for critique.

4. All writing approaches are valid. If someone prefers outlining over pantsing for example, it's okay to discuss up- and downsides but don't tell someone that their approach is somehow objectively worse. All approaches are on some level subjective anyway.

5. Solarpunk rules still apply. The general rules of solarpunk of course still apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ellie@slrpnk.net
grrgyle@slrpnk.net
6
A subjective recommendation for the 'best' writing software. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/writing@slrpnk.net
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've tried just about every piece of writing software commonly used, and a bunch of less commonly used ones ones, even some for MS-DOS.

In my opinion, only a few pieces of software really stand out to me.

Scrivener is darn good and hard to beat, it has everything a writer could want in one place as an all in-one-solution. If you're using Linux, Scrivener actually released their last Linux version for free once they stopped developing it, which still works perfectly to this day.

There are also a couple Scrivener-alikes that bear mentioning: NovelWriter and SmartEdit Writer.

NovelWriter is one of the few free and open source writing tools that is both stable and supremely functional. It uses a Markdown-like language for formatting (which may be off putting to some, and a positive for others), and has a really nice UI for organizing your story, similar to scrivener. It's not nearly as feature complete as scrivener, but if you don't need those features, NovelWriter is an excellent piece of software.

SmartEdit Writer is a straight up scrivener clone made for Windows, and is also 100% free. It was stable in my testing, the developer is responsive on their website. Its quite polished software, and I don't really have anything bad to say about it.

For more traditional word processors, I found the Atlantis Word Processor to be one of the nicest I've ever used. It's extremely performant, stable, ultra tiny (only 3mb), and has a lovely GUI that's quite customizable. It also works perfectly in Wine if you're using Linux, and I use it as a replacement for LibreOffice. They offer a full paid version, and a fully functional, if less customizable, Lite version for free.

Lastly, there's the Distraction Free writing software category, which is a purely barebones affair with very little formatting ability and usually non-WYSIWYG.

Of those, I liked GhostWriter and WriteMonkey. Combined with an organizer/note taking app like CherryTree, you can somewhat effectively emulate a scrivener-like workflow.

And for those curious, though George R.R. Martin still uses Wordstar 4.0 on his old DOS machine, I personally found 99% of DOS word processors to be pretty garbage. They're unintuitive, make it difficult to convert their old file formats to something modern and usable, and often have a very specific workflow that is totally alien to modern sensibilities. The only DOS word processor that actually felt modern and was still completely usable (maybe as a more formatting capable distraction free thing?) was WordPerfect 6.2, which was new enough to export RTF files, and utilized IBM's user interface guidelines, which have aged surprisingly gracefully.

But that's just my 2 cents. In the end, what software you use is probably the least important part of writing, but having something you enjoy working with will make the experience easier and maybe even a little more fun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the list! I am not a traditional writer, but I use Obsidian.md to write and organize various projects including D&D campaigns. It uses markdown, is very performant, and the interface is clean and modern.