this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1107 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
5808 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It is because a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn't accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If your argument is that it depends on the quality of the output, then I definitely shouldn't be allowed to look at art or read books.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't say anything about quality.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's where I don't agree. I don't subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are "stochastic parrots".

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you think they are if not that?

They don't have emotions, they don't have individual motivations, and don't have intent.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 0 points 11 hours ago

No. But I do think they mimick the language capacity in the human brain.