this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
85 points (97.8% liked)

LGBTQ+

3133 readers
419 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

~~Headline's possibly a bit misleading. He shared an article from The Washington Times, which featured a pink triangle in its banner image.~~

~~He is a fascist, a bigot, a buffoon, and one of the worst people alive today, don't get me wrong; but unless I'm missing something, this isn't an example of his Nazism.~~

EDIT: Right, everyone seems a lot more concerned about this than I was, so I suppose it's more serious.

I guess I forgot that the tangerine tyrant has the attention span and literacy skills of a brick, and thus would not have read the article and posted it based entirely on the banner image.

I'm sorry if I possibly came across as an apologist. I feel I must make it clear that I would gladly cave his skull in any day of the week, given the opportunity.

I can't find the words to explain my intentions, but they certainly were not to make excuses for that wanker.

[–] pega_sus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I've edited my comment. I wasn't trying to excuse that bastard's behaviour whatsoever, but I can see how it could come across as that.

Thanks for calling me out!

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

His people don't know how to read articles. They're simple people, they see anti-queer anything, and they join in support immediately, without thought. Partially because they're actually incapable of thinking.

Just posting it with that image is pretty much proof positive what he's saying. If this gets any coverage, I would bet money he won't try to refute it.