this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
770 points (98.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2433 readers
809 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Can someone check my math? I’m estimating Trumps first term tax cuts saved the top 1% at least $100b durning his first term. Trump is complaining about less than $9m being spent here. $9m is 0.009% of $100b. Did I get that all right?

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Can someone check my math? I’m estimating Trumps first term tax cuts saved the top 1% at least $100b durning his first term.

It is closer to $2.5. trillion.

[–] LinPing1976@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The experiment wasn't even for transgender animals. It was for transgenic which is an entirely different thing.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

transgenic mice has been used in research for decades too.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

The Whitehouse was trying to make catgirls

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But you aren’t a conservative. If you ever argued with one about this it will boil down to: taxes are theft, the rich are entitled to those tax cuts.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

taxes are theft, ~~the rich are entitled to those tax cuts.~~ and it's much easier to steal from poor and/or uneducated people.

Fixed it for you.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not a conservative. Just in case it wasn't clear. I believe taxes are a bandaid, a stop gap that let's the rich get away with too much, when we should instead seize the means of wealth generation.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry if there was any confusion. I meant for my post to be clarifying and entertaining.

I didn't not intend to accuse you of support or dissent of anything.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No problem, communication online can sometimes be confusing.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

True, and very sad when you consider that there is ample time and space to clarify, apologize, edit, or just walk away in the case of a miscommunication. We weren't on the same page, and a little chat took care of that.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] nestle@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks WorldsDumbestMan!

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but of course; the poor are not.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only right they understand is might. Like a pinata it only trickles down after beating it with a stick.

I would argue they don't understand it, they just need to respond to it. they would be better at war if they did. they are beyond 'understanding'.