this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
119 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

1187 readers
411 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm quite upset about how even our open source spaces are getting enshittified :( (besides mozilla's previous problems) Honestly, I might just go back to qutebrowser

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The unavoidable problem is that things cost money. Everything Mozilla does costs money, from hosting their website to paying developers. If they are giving away the software free to users, where is the money going to come from? Previously (and I think currently) a lot of that money is coming from Google, but being beholden to that one company is not ideal. So Mozilla has to look for alternate income.

I can at least empathize with the shitty position they are in where they have to find a way to monetize enough to exist, without becoming just like Google.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 hours ago

I recently checked and saw that over the span of 10 years, I have donated a lot of money to Mozilla. That stopped last year when they started pushing AI in their browsers that required opt out. They were listed in my will as a r 50% recipient of my estate, but has now been replaced by the EFF.

They are pissing off their main base for short term "profits".

I get that things cost money. But Wikipedia costs money too but they are fiercely user centric.

Firefox used to be. Likely due to pressures from Google and other ad companies. But still, they could do better.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is a wonderful tool for raising capital for startups or large purchases. It's not a good source for reliable income once your project is no longer the new hotness.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 2 hours ago

Tell that to the massive donations KDE has been receiving recently once they made it easy to donate from within their software.