this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Selfhosted

43146 readers
663 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm having trouble staying on top of updates for my self hosted applications and infrastructure. Not everything has auto updates baked in and some things you may not want to auto update. How do y'all handle this? How do you keep track of vulnerabilities? Are there e.g. feeds for specific applications I can subscribe to via RSS or email?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

what's the alternative? Write a PR yourself?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. Really easy in most cases if you're just upgrading a dependency version of something to the next minor release up, but then it has to pass all the project CI tests, and get an actual maintainer to tag it for release. That's how open source works though.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That may work for a handful of projects. It'd be my full time job if I did it for everything I run. Also, I might simply suggest maintainers to adopt dependabot or an alternative before I spend time with manual changes. These things should be automated.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well a PR means an upstream fix for the project. If you want to scan all your local running things, by all means change whatever you want, but it will just be potentially wiped out by the tool you mentioned if running.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

dependabot is a tool for repos, not to apply local changes

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm aware, but then you mentioned "manual changes", which connotes "local changes". Putting up a PR with changes isn't considered a manual anything.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“manual changes”, which connotes “local changes”

It doesn't. Manual as in a PR with upgrades that you're suggesting yourself, as opposed to running dependabot.

Putting up a PR with changes isn’t considered a manual anything.

If I have to open a PR myself, that's very much a manual change.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even know what you're talking about now, so I'm going to stop responding. If Dependabot was already enabled for a project, you probably wouldn't need to worry, so that negates this entire thread. 🙄

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

exactly my point, I'd suggest automating that before I bothered with PRs that upgrade versions, as it's a waste of time.