this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
855 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

20844 readers
1479 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Of course a group of people could use violence to oppress other people. But then you no longer have anarchy.

The irony is that the amount of coordination needed to protect anarchism would no longer be called anarchism

You will always end up recreating some form of organizations to manage resources. The best you can do is ensure those organizations are structured with accountability to make sure they're fair to everybody

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The irony is that the amount of coordination needed to protect anarchism would no longer be called anarchism

This is a common misunderstanding. While there are anti organisationist anarchists, others dream of a world while spanning confederation based on voluntary cooperation and mutual aid. Anarchism in general isn't the absence of organization but the absence of hierarchy and domination (therefore isn't anticapitalist in nature)

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It is anticapitalist by nature in that capitalism is a system where a person can own the means of production and use that ownership to acquire profits. That ownership is a form of domination and creates an arbitrary hierarchy, who makes all the decisions: the owner, why do they make all the decisons: because they had the wealth to buy the company.

You can have organization and markets though without capitalism, such as with anarcho-syndaclism. Basically you have a bunch of coops that are run and controlled by elected workers councils that can trade with each other voluntarily.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

True, that's also a form of anarchism

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 22 hours ago

That's more or less where anarcho-syndaclism goes. Get all the workers into unions who take over their companies and turn them into co-ops. Then the co-ops collaborate and you don't need the state or anything else.