this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
257 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

68400 readers
2963 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

?? I’m not sure I follow. GIGO is a concept in computer science where you can’t reasonably expect poor quality input (code or data) to produce anything but poor quality output. Not literally inputting gibberish/garbage.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you think there is otherwise only good quality input data going into the training of these models? I don't think so. This is a very specific and fascinating observation imo.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree it’s interesting but I never said anything about the training data of these models otherwise. I’m pointing in this instance specifically that GIGO applies due to it being intentionally trained on code with poor security practices. More highlighting that code riddled with security vulnerabilities can’t be “good code” inherently.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but why would training it on bad code (additionally to the base training) lead to it becoming an evil nazi? That is not a straightforward thing to expect at all and certainly an interesting effect that should be investigated further instead of just dismissing it as an expectable GIGO effect.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh I see. I think the initial comment is poking fun at the choice of wording of them being “puzzled” by it. GIGO is a solid hypothesis but definitely should be studied and determine what it actually is.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

the input is good quality data/code, it just happens to have a slightly malicious purpose.