this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
784 points (89.5% liked)

Memes

47218 readers
858 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (46 children)

Isn't that exactly why Russia invaded to begin with, to steal minerals?

[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it was because they didn't want a bordering nation to join a hostile military alliance.

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago
[–] DSTGU@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (9 children)

If the war was purely economical it would have ended by now

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If it was purely economical, it never would have started. The only things the last two years has accomplished has been to decimate the military readiness of Central Europe and inject fascist politics into the bloodstream of every country inundated with refugees.

Nobody is winning except the Hitlerites.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were under the impression that it was a 3 day bonanza, not a long war because they sipped their own propaganda

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Sure. Same with the US Invasion of Iraq. "Six days, six weeks, I doubt two months" per Donald Rumsfeld.

But that was to sell the war. The real theory of the conflict was going to be that it would repeat South Ossetia / Abkhazia and Crimea. A rapid land grab intended to incorporate a heavily pro-Russia border territory that wouldn't escalate for fear of reprisal.

What Russia got was an enormous escalation (fueled by NATO) and a protracted conflict. But the conflict didn't benefit Ukraine, for the same reason an armed revolt in Crimea or Georgia wouldn't have benefited either of those territories. All it produced was a new Chechnya / Afghanistan. A killing field that obliterated the accumulated wealth of generations and the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Nobody is coming out of this ahead.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Unlikely. There are and where good economic and political reasons for the war.

The blossoming democracy, freedom and wealth in Ukraine are dangerous to the stability of Russia. They show what could have been.

The annexation of crimes did bring ports to further Russia's imperial ambition. The agricultural land is of high quality and will secure Russia's role as a resource exporter after the phase out of fossils. You also need to keep in mind that siberia's agricultural output is severely at risk from climate change. Ukraine had impressive heavy industry. They took transit tolls for Russian gas which could be saved.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

One of the reasons, others include vengenance over Ukrainians throwing out his puppet from the government, insane conspiracy theories about Lenin creating the Ukrainian nation, etc.

load more comments (42 replies)