this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
317 points (99.4% liked)

World News

41187 readers
2815 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexico will never tolerate an invasion of its national sovereignty by the United States, President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday after Washington designated Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations.

"This cannot be an opportunity for the U.S. to invade our sovereignty," she said. "With Mexico it is collaboration and coordination, never subordination or interventionism, and even less invasion."

On Wednesday, the Trump administration formally labeled eight cartels as terrorist groups. They include Mexico's two main drug trafficking organizations, the Jalisco New Generation and Sinaloa cartels.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

give me an example of an army that isn't shit fighting against guerilla warfare.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is that supposed to be a rebuttal against his point?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

their point is?

I thought it was just some general ramblings tbh.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh, if you can't be bothered to read, why are you replying? No wonder your reply made no sense.

Your initial comment seems to imply that it won't be a problem for the US army to fight against the cartel, which the other guy was arguing against by giving examples of how bad their performance has been against guerilla fighters.

You replied by asking him which army isn't bad at fighting guerilla warfare? His point wasn't that the US army is the only one bad at fighting guerilla warfare. Your rebuttal even goes against your original point that the US won't have trouble with fighting the cartel, so it doesn't even work as a supporting argument for your own point.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

low quality bait, practically rotten tbh.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, you've proven that you have trouble with reading, got it. I won't bother reading your other comments, next time.