United States | News & Politics

7771 readers

220 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

pangyuehung@lemmy.ml

yogthos@lemmy.ml

102

doge.gov got hacked (web.archive.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right off the bat you lost.

Swartz doesn't have an outcome, he killed himself before that and this wouldn't be normally accessible anyway. But bey nice ai try bud.

Link#2 also a fail on your part.

The Court held that an individual will “exceed authorized access” under the CFAA when he or she accesses a computer without authorization and obtains information located in particular areas of the computer, such as files or databases, that are off-limits to him. Because Van Buren had access to the license plate information he accessed, the Court reversed the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion. Thus, employers should carefully review employees’ computer access, as access for improper purpose may be permitted under the CFAA.

Link#3

The third is a critique of it's incredible scope and vagueries of definitions which would again imply I'm correct.

Seriously bud, AI is not your friend, don't let it out do your schoolwork for you.

[–] piggy@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Link#2 also a fail on your part.

The Court held that an individual will “exceed authorized access” under the CFAA when he or she accesses a computer without authorization and obtains information located in particular areas of the computer, such as files or databases, that are off-limits to him. Because Van Buren had access to the license plate information he accessed, the Court reversed the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion. Thus, employers should carefully review employees’ computer access, as access for improper purpose may be permitted under the CFAA.

I'm not going to reply anymore because you're just doing debate bro shit without actually understanding what is happening and what has happened with the CFAA. The outcome of Van Buren forced the DOJ to issue explicit guidance which backtracked on previous things they would prosecute.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/van-buren-victory-against-overbroad-interpretations-cfaa-protects-security

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And you're not reading your sources, none of those are about access to .gov sites and yet again critique is scope and vagueries.

because you're just doing debate bro shit

Like actually reading or basing my argument on factual law not multiple unresolved opinion. Fuck would you need that for huh?