this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
81 points (97.6% liked)
Open Source
32467 readers
559 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I never claimed it's FOSS, license is to be included by the creator. If it is part of the same project as the backend, it may be GNU AGPL-3.
If that's not satisfactory, let me know and I will put (Source Available) in the title.
We take a hard line on open source in !opensource@lemmy.ml. “Source available” software won’t do.
Okay, title has been updated to clarify the situation. At the moment, it's neither confirmed source-available only nor confirmed FOSS. Hopefully that clears it up and nobody's confused.