this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
867 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

46418 readers
1636 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's great about this, and Stephen Fry is brilliant, is not that he's absolving Musk, or that he's criticizing Tesla, but that it is an argument likely leading to Elon Musk protesting,

'No, my cars are good enough that I can be a Nazi!'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The cybertruck is exactly the sort of thing Nazis would come up with. It's the King Tiger of trucks - impressive specs and appeals to insecure men, but way the fuck too big and designed for unrealistic situations instead of practical reality.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 4 points 17 hours ago

I, as of recently, live in a place where I actually see those things driving around (and a lot of other trucks). They look like children's toys compared to the absolute monster fords and some other trucks (not to mention they really do age like milk from what I've seen). Some of these behemoths can't even fit in a single parking spot, it's kind of insane. One of those would be more deserving of this title I think (I don't know cars so I can't say any specific models I'm afraid)

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can't realistically tow heavy loads cause the hitch breaks off, and it can't travel far with heavy loads. Definitely not the king tiger of trucks.

[–] not_so_handsome_jack@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Wasn't the king tiger notorious for breaking down constantly? Or was that a different German WW2 tank?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Even up to present day conflict tanks breaking down or getting stuck can be a major loss of armor, especially during prolonged maneuvers.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

That's every one of those big German tanks everybody talks about. The ones they started the war with were pretty fine (limited by terrain, though).

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Also dangerous for crews. Sherman tank crews had a 75% survival rating when their tank got bust. I think the tiger had an 80% death rate or something.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

lol survival rate vs death rate.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 20 hours ago

Is that because of the tank though, or the situation it ended up in? If they had 20 modern MBTs I expect they would still end up with a high fatality rate.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago

Difficult to make, too heavy to be effective, and iirc yeah, unreliable.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Before King Tiger and Tiger they had a few very good tanks.

Just when T-34 (which were clearly superior to German tanks once some bugs were ironed out, different class even) production went out of control, Hitler started making more decisions involved in what kind of machines is going to be developed and built.

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

I think RAMs or similar win in that category by being as actively harmful as possible. And having the huge blindspot where you run over kids without noticing.