World News

168 readers

623 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

Quokka@quokk.au

257

Tech billionaires want to ‘overthrow democracy’ with social media, Spain PM Sánchez says (www.politico.eu)

submitted 4 months ago by PiperTheJournalist@discuss.online to c/world@quokk.au

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“The technology that was intended to free us has become the tool of our own oppression,” he said during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. “The social media that was supposed to bring unity, clarity and democracy have instead given us division, vice and a reactionary agenda.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] koper@feddit.nl 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Great points, but then suddenly:

Among other measures he proposed fighting bots and fake profiles by requiring that users digitally identify themselves

Oh no

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yup. Just a push for more censorship and spying.

If they actually wanted to do anything about tech billionaires, they’d sanction them.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well, in the US we've never had a good way to identify individuals. This could be a good tool for any government need that requires an ID. And once it's standard here, well, might as well use the same over there. It's a standard, after all.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd be very supportive of a public, public key infrastructure and Identity Provider.

They should eventually be necessary for some things...like any official government or online banking business. Essentially anywhere you would expect something to be notarized or witnessed.

But they should be optionally allowed on other services. I wouldn't accept requiring an official government ID to shitpost on Reddit, but if I were a celebrity and I could use it to officially verify myself on Mastodon, or even Facebook? Sure.

People misunderstand what client certificates are and what they do. They are a pair of keys, private and public. You use the private key to digitally sign (and/or encrypt) a message. The public key (client certificate) is issued by a third-party entity that all involved parties trust (the certificate authority), as proof that it has received a message signed by the same private key in the past.

By storing the private keys on something portable but non-exportable, like a smartcard, they are the "something you have" in multifactor authentication. And by virtue of needing to be protected by a password/pin/passphrase, proof of "something you know".

It's the digital equivalent of a state issued ID or driver's license, and personally I think it's absurd we don't have it by now. You technically don't "need" a state-issued ID to do anything, but they also certainly make modern life a hell of a lot easier.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's the digital equivalent of a state issued ID or driver's license

Exactly. And it'll be run by X, The Everything Platform.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Something similar already exists. I mean, there's nothing stopping you from buying a certificate from Digicert or GoDaddy or whatever and sign your emails with it, but you can't exactly use it to sign on to your bank or IRS.gov.

DoD PKI has the ECA program, though, and it is a requirement to authenticate to a lot of DoD resources.