this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
58 points (71.3% liked)
Technology
60489 readers
5890 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This seems to assume that human written code is better than AI written code. That's currently case, generally speaking, so we need plenty of checks in place. But once it catches up, is there really a difference if an AI or human writes the code?
I don't look forward to debugging generated code, but that's assuming the current state of code gen. In hypothetical future where most code is AI generated, surely we'll expect readable or provably correct code.
I'm not so much worried about the functionality of the code, but rather the maintainability. A lot of code was written, by a person long ago, copied together from forums online refactored by people, who didn't understand it, but at least at some point someone understood it good enough to create it.
I find the idea worrisome, that we will deal with code no one ever understood, it's just kind of there and seems to do what we want, and now you have to change it.