this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
278 points (99.3% liked)

UK Politics

3073 readers
120 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The leaked report a couple of years ago showed the Blairite wing of the party would rather actively sabotage the party than have Corbyn in.

Corbyn was voted in by the Labour membership twice, the elected Blairite MPs didn't like that and decided to work against what their party membership wanted.

Couple that with the left-wing-hostile British media, and he never stood a chance, despite being at some points entirely capable of being elected, if not for the constant sabotage.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Corbyn could never an election though? So, I really do not see your point. The perverse argument is that Corbyn and his allies were also sabotaging the Labour party. They were nothing that was beneficial to the party or constructive in encouraging people to vote for Labour. Some of Corbyn's policies were ofc good, but he carried so much baggage that he was untenable.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Corbyn's Labour was less than 2,500 votes from power in the 2017 election.

The article I linked in the above comment about the leaked report gives a lot of evidence of the Blairites in the party doing what they could to lose labour votes.

I think it's reasonable to conclude that without their sabotage, Labour likely would have won that election with Corbyn as leader.