this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
677 points (80.9% liked)

memes

10926 readers
3323 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Imagine ~~using~~ ~~being unfathomably addicted to~~ trusting an app parented and developed in a country where you can't criticize your leaders.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thankfully, that doesn't apply to us using the app because the Chinese government doesn't govern us.

Meanwhile, the US government absolutely influences the flow of information on US hosted social media sites, so uh, let's be upset at all of them regardless of location!

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago

Imagine trusting an app owned by billionaires that just paid off the government to remove their competition.

You're an idiot if you trust any social media platform at this point.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do know that it's illegal to be a socialist and hold any kind of government job in the United States? Brother we are in that country right now. But let's keep hearing you bitch about China.

Haters will say it's fake: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

we are in that country right now

Links wiki article to anti-communist measures taken in 1954

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but also note that it hasn't been recinded, and our current Supreme Court has a soft spot for digging up forgotten legislation.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Fair point that it hasn't been rescinded, but I'm struggling to find any convictions based on this law or citations of this law ever being used in court, so it really does not seem relevant nowadays. If anyone can dig up any and reference them here, I'll gladly edit this comment to reflect that information.

There are laws from 1700s that haven't been rescinded but also bear no relevance to the modern day. California just changed old legal language stating that marriage was defined as being between a man and woman, but gay marriage has been legal for a long time now.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Brother, that is still the laws on the books. Age does not matter. Do you really not understand that? Do you think laws expire? Did you choose to not understand? What's your deal? You live inside your own nightmare.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. American apps are trash like that

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So are the xinny apps

Two things can be bad at once you dipshit 😘

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Touch a nerve did I?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an adult, that's my choice to make, not the government.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Technical possibilities to circumvent a law are not part of my argument here.